Propuesta de Diseño de Estación Análoga en RV para la Simulación de Misiones en Marte

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Realidad virtual; estación análoga; misiones análogas marcianas; simulación espacial; hábitat marciano; entrenamiento inmersivo; exploración a Marte.

Resumen

El diseño de estaciones análogas en Marte con Realidad Virtual (RV) representa una oportunidad para simular las misiones análogas que se realizan en la Tierra actualmente. Este estudio presenta la propuesta de diseño y estructura inicial de una estación análoga con el potencial del uso de la RV como herramienta clave para su desarrollo. La RV ofrece la ventaja de entornos marcianos similares de manera accesible, replicando factores como la geografía y condiciones climáticas. Por otro lado, su uso en misiones análogas es compatible para garantizar una salud física y psicológica a la hora de la inmersión con complementos de inteligencia artificial (IA). Se concluye que el diseño de esta propuesta, apoyado en realidad virtual, optimiza la planificación y preparación de misiones análogas. Permitiendo así, evaluar y mejorar diversos factores como la habitabilidad, la capacitación y la reducción de costos. De este modo, se consolida a la RV como un pilar naciente en la simulación marciana.

Citas

[1] C. Heinicke and M. Arnhof, “A review of existing analog habitats and lessons for future lunar and Martian habitats,” REACH, vols. 21–22, Art. no. 100038, 2021.

[2] K. Stecuła, “Virtual reality applications market analysis—On the example of Steam digital platform,” Informatics, vol. 9, no. 4, Art. no. 100, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040100

[3] A. Del Mastro, F. Monaco, and Y. Benyoucef, “A multi-user virtual reality experience for space missions,” Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 134–137, 2021.

[4] V. Garg, V. Singh, and L. Soni, “Preparing for space: How virtual reality is revolutionizing astronaut training,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. Women Innov., Technol. Entrepreneurship (ICWITE), Bangalore, India, 2024, pp. 78–84.

[5] P. Strojny and N. Dużmańska-Misiarczyk, “Measuring the effectiveness of virtual training: A systematic review,” Computers & Education: X Reality, vol. 2, Art. no. 100006, Jan. 2023.

[6] J. Gocłowska-Bolek, “Latin American space research—Challenges and opportunities,” Transactions on Aerospace Research, vol. 2017, no. 4, pp. 24–34, 2017.

[7] R. Olanda, M. Pérez, P. Morillo, M. Fernández, and S. Casas, “Entertainment virtual reality system for simulation of spaceflights over the surface of the planet Mars,” in Proc. ACM Symp. Virtual Reality Software Technol. (VRST), Limassol, Cyprus, 2006, pp. 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180495.1180522

[8] Space Station Research Integration Office, “Nine ways we use AR and VR on the International Space Station,” NASA, Sep. 20, 2021. Accessed: Aug. 5, 2026. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/station/nine-ways-we-use-ar-and-vr-on-the-international-space-station/

[9] A. Märki, “Radiation analysis for Moon and Mars missions,” International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 16–21, 2020.

[10] A. Barnard, S. T. Engler, and K. Binsted, “Mars habitat power consumption constraints, prioritization, and optimization,” Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 256–264, 2019.

[11] H. Sun et al., “Designing sustainable built environments for Mars habitation: Integrating innovations in architecture, systems, and human well-being,” Nexus, vol. 1, no. 3, Art. no. 100030, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynexs.2024.100030

[12] A. Eglin and E. Guinan, “The Mars gardens: A comparison of the viability of plants grown in Martian simulant regolith and in a hydroponics system,” in American Astronomical Society Meeting, vol. 52, no. 1, Honolulu, HI, USA, Jan. 4–8, 2020.

[13] S. Bouriat, M. Poliaček, and J. Smith, “Overview of activities conducted during the ARES-III and LEARN analog missions in the LunAres habitat,” Space Science and Technology, vol. 2022, 2022.

[14] A. H. Morsi, G. D. Massa, R. C. Morrow, R. M. Wheeler, M. A. Elsysy, and C. A. Mitchell, “Leaf yield and mineral content of mizuna in response to cut-and-come-again harvest, substrate particle size, and fertilizer formulation in a simulated spaceflight environment,” Life Sciences in Space Research, vol. 40, pp. 106–114, 2024.

[15] D. Bețco, P.-V. Pârvu, and S. Ciudin, “Autonomous navigation for the Martian Inspection Drone,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 216, pp. 55–63, Mar. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.12.052

[16] NASA, “NASA’s Crew Health and Performance Exploration Analog & Habitat.” Accessed: Aug. 5, 2026. https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/chapea/habitat/

[17] European Space Agency, “Space Station fitness,” Mar. 11, 2017. Accessed: Aug. 5, 2026. https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2017/03/Space_Station_fitness

[18] A. Choukèr et al., “Hibernating astronauts—Science or fiction?” Pflügers Archiv—European Journal of Physiology, vol. 471, pp. 819–828, 2019.

[19] A. Choukér, T. J. Ngo-Anh, R. Biesbroek, G. Heldmaier, M. Heppener, and J. Bereiter-Hahn, “European Space Agency’s hibernation (torpor) strategy for deep space missions: Linking biology to engineering,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 131, pp. 618–626, 2021.

[20] B. Le Roy, C. Aufauvre-Poupon, A. Ferragu, A. Vannier, C. Martin-Krumm, and M. Trousselard, “Cardiac biosignal in confined nuclear submarine patrol: Heart rate variability as a marker of adaptation,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 203, pp. 469–482, 2023.

[21] S. Haeuplik-Meusburger, C. Paterson, D. Schubert, and P. Zabel, “Greenhouses and their humanizing synergies,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 96, pp. 138–150, 2014.

[22] Microsoft Research, “Holoportation.” Accessed: Aug. 5, 2026. https://www.microsoft.com/research/project/holoportation-3/

[23] ABC News, “Six return to real world after four months on ‘Mars’,” Jul. 25, 2014. Accessed: Aug. 5, 2026. https://abcnews.go.com/US/return-real-world-months-mars/story?id=24720124

[24] Y. Shi and G. Shen, “Haptic sensing and feedback techniques toward virtual reality,” Research, vol. 7, Art. no. 0333, 2024. https://doi.org/10.34133/research.0333

[25] E. Messerschmid and R. Bertrand, “Environmental control and life support system,” in Space Stations: Systems and Utilization. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1999, pp. 109–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03974-8_4

[26] M. Attaran and B. G. Celik, “Digital twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 6, Art. no. 100165, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165

[27] M. van Ombergen et al., “The effect of spaceflight and microgravity on the human brain,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 264, suppl. 1, pp. 18–22, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8427-x

[28] M. C. Howard and M. B. Gutworth, “A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs for social skill development,” Computers & Education, vol. 144, Art. no. 103707, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103707

Descargas

Publicado

2026-08-14

Cómo citar

Koo Saenz, K. E., Montenegro Arrasco, D. A., Fernández Lagos, E. H. S., & Pilares Aique, J. G. (2026). Propuesta de Diseño de Estación Análoga en RV para la Simulación de Misiones en Marte. Latin American Journal of Astronautics, 1(1), 1–13. Recuperado a partir de https://journal.intinauta.com/index.php/laja/article/view/9